Categories:
See Also:

Corvette Forum Archive (38 950 posts)






LeftLetterRight





German versionFrench version

Subject:
Re: Bad Harmonic Balancer

From: "Dad" <knockers(at)fisher.net>

Subject: Re: Bad Harmonic Balancer

Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:15:30 -0500

Lines: 79

NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.201.40.128

________________________________________________









Did you just tighten the bolt to see if it had allowed it to "wobble"?

If you note his pictures the bolt head is off center, my guess is that

it`s loose, not discentagrating. I`m sure replacing a good balancer

and tighten the bolt will also correct the problem, but costs more

than to tighten the bolt on the old one. Of course I`m still guessing

but if I had gone to the trouble of taking the pictures I might have

tried to tighten the bolt also. The rubber looked OK, although it did

have a bigger than normal gap.



--

Dad

05 C6 Silver/Red 6spd Z51

72 Shark Black/Black/4spd



"sbright" <sbright(at)comcast.net> wrote in message

news:hcqdndUTT8r2RVXeRVn-sQ(at)comcast.com...

> Dad-

>

> I know what you`re saying..but.. I had an annoying squeeky belt on

> my 2000 C5. Ultimately, it was quited down by replacing the

> crankshaft pulley. Hard to believe.. but it was "wobbly". Car had

> about 50K miles on it at the > time.

>

> Steve- The pulley is reaplaced from the underneath. The steering

> rack needs to come out to get at it. Procharger (ATI) has a kit to

> pin the pulley to the crank. You basically drill a hole in the pin

> of the crank which goes into the pulley and put a pin in it. In

> addition to being bolted on with the big bolt which by the way is

> not supposed to be reused. I`m telling you this because if you

> ever decide to supercharge your car(highly recommended), your

> mechanic would have to repeat what he is doing here. Four hours

> sounds right for the job.

>

> -Stan

> `99 Blown C5 Vert

> `00 Coupe

>

> "Steve Horrillo" <usenet(at)stephenhorrillo.com> wrote in message

> news:l2Ywf.160166$aS5.128798(at)bignews4.bellsouth.net...

>>

>> On 10-Jan-2006, "Dad" <knockers(at)fisher.net> wrote:

>>

>>> > Steve:

>>> >> I reported in earlier posts that my belts on my `98 C5 were

>>> >> squeaking. I

>>> >> took it to a friend`s shop and he found that the rubber in the

>>> >> harmonic

>>> >> balancer is all worn and wobbling.

>>>

>>> I doubt this is the case, it may be loose but no way the rubber is

>>> worn in the balancer. Just to let you know the LS1 has an oil

>>> filled

>>> crankshaft and if the bolt comes loose it will allow a black

>>> residue

>>> to form. Would have said something earlier but I block spamm.

>>

>> I posted a up couple of close up pictures at

>> http://stephenhorrillo.com/C5_harmonic_balancer.htm. Let me know

>> what you

>> think. Notice the gap, the cracking rubber and the way it`s pushed

>> in on one

>> side and hanging out on the other. If you need pictures with a

>> higher

>> resolution or a movie of it spinning let me know.

>>

>> Should I replace it? If I just replace the belts should the

>> squeaking stop?

>> When I spray belt dressing on the main belt the sqeaking stops for

>> a little

>> while but there`s still a sort of rattleling sound.

>>

>> --

>> Many thanks Dad and everyone,

>>

>> Steve

>

>








Next Topic
Subject: Re: Bad Harmonic Balancer

From: "Stephen Horrillo" <usenet(at)stephenhorrillo.com>

Lines: 22

Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 03:40:21 GMT

________________________________________________











On 14-Jan-2006, "Dad" <knockers(at)fisher.net> wrote:



> Did you just tighten the bolt to see if it had allowed it to "wobble"?

> If you note his pictures the bolt head is off center, my guess is that

> it`s loose, not discentagrating. I`m sure replacing a good balancer

> and tighten the bolt will also correct the problem, but costs more

> than to tighten the bolt on the old one. Of course I`m still guessing

> but if I had gone to the trouble of taking the pictures I might have

> tried to tighten the bolt also. The rubber looked OK, although it did

> have a bigger than normal gap.



I took the picture by driving up the parking stop. It wasn`t up high enough

to check the bolt. Just high enough to stich my arm under the car. Great

observation though. Thanks. I`ll have it retorqued and centered if possible.

Seems odd that it`s possible that the mounting hole in the flywheel would be

large enough to be that far off center?



--

All the best,



Stephen






Next Topic
Subject: Bad Harmonic Balancer

From: "Stephen" <usenet(at)+++.com>

Lines: 13

Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 14:33:05 GMT

________________________________________________









I have a `98/C5. The rubber that separates the harmonic balancer from the

flywheel has broken off. So I guess it needs the whole assembly. Is there

any altenative? I understand when a blower is put in there`s a way to lock

the two together. Can the rubber relaced? If indeed the whole balancer needs

replacement what should be a fair cost? Is this something I should take it

to a dealer for or use a trusted mechanic?



PS: does anyone have the repair instructions for this job?



--

All the best,



Stephen








Last "Cars" Post on Wordpress:


Title: Rare Black Ferrari Enzo For Sale on eBay for $1.3M
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 09:19:49 +0000
Author: Chelley-Credible

I have a love for fast sporty cars…no Honda’s please! Got $1.3M? …didn’t th
More on: http://chelleycredible.wordpress.com/2009/09/26/rare-black-ferrrari-enzo-for-sale-on-ebay-for-1-3m/



____________________________________________

Title: Clarification on Previous Post - "Examples All Around" from Sep 22, 09
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:02:09 +0000
Author: TrueManhood

I really appreciate the comment from a reader who asked me to clarify why I think the descriptions from the previously-posted Facebook status update (posted originally on September 22, 2009) was so horrible.  Here goes:

As you can see, the Facebooker updated their status with one of those “quizzes” to rate yourself on “What Movie Badass Are You?”  His initial response was “Guns, Girls and Cars… isn’t that the definition of a badass?”  I first want to mention that most guys want to appear “hard” or, in this case, a “badass”.  It’s that thing inside us, a territorial thing, an “I can kick your butt” thing.  There’s a connotation that goes along with that feeling… that in order to really be hard, you must get as many women as possible, you’ve absolutely got to have a sweet ride and the more guns and ammo you have, the harder you must be.  (I could continue on with other categories – how much money you have, what kind of house you live in, what you do for a living, how many employees you have, how many vacations you take, how much power you hold, how many and what kind of scars you have, etc.)  This is an example of “cultural manliness”. 

The idea of cultural manliness is that, as you accumulate more wealth, as you sleep with more women, as you buy more stuff and as your power “ranking” goes up, the more manly you are.  Cultural manliness never takes into account your virtue, your faith, your relationship with God and/or others, how you treat your wife/children/family/friends/strangers/etc.  Cultural manliness is a facade, a lie, a demeaning and empty way of living.  The glamour of being a “culturally manly” man will wear off in time.  How many people will a culturally manly man hurt along the way?

Back to the post… the description (in this case, of James Bond) mentions traits that might be good, if explained more and in the correct context.  However, in the context they are in, these traits (strong, fast, clever, refined, etc.) lead only to one trait, “…and still get laid in the process.”  These traits aren’t listed in order to positively affect the world or in order for you to become the best man you can become, they’re listed in order to lead towards women sleeping with you.  There is a great disparity between these two distinctions. 

Let me make myself clear here… there’s nothing wrong with being attractive, refined and clever.  There’s nothing wrong with women being drawn to you.  The problem here is that the motivation to be those things and to possess those traits is skewed and misguided.  Deep down, inside every man, there’s an urge to be “manly” – to be courageous and daring, attractive and intelligent.  Listen to what God is saying through your urge to be manly, so that you know what He wants from you.  Once you feel the urge and know exactly what God wants you to do with it, you’ll be living a purposeful life for God!

I hope this clarification helps.

Man up!


More on: http://truemanhood.wordpress.com/2009/09/24/clarification-on-previous-post-examples-all-around-from-sep-22-09/